Digital Asset Digest Newsletter
Print/PDF Print/PDF

Could Wall Street’s Irrational Exuberance Underwrite America’s AI Future?

Could Wall Street’s Irrational Exuberance Underwrite America’s AI Future?
PRICE SNAPSHOT
(7 Day Change as of September 19, 2025 8:50AM ET)
Bitcoin Price: $116,223  1.04%
DeFi Total-Value-Locked: $161B (0.62%)
Ethereum Price: $4,521  0.03%
Crypto Market Cap: $4.06T 0.00%
Bitcoin Range: $114,535 - $117,849
TKN.U Close: $22.24 (as at Sep 18, 2025)
Ethereum Range: $4,430 - $4,761
TKN.U NAV: $22.22
Bitcoin Dominance: 57.10% 0.00%
TKN.U Premium: 0.09%
STORY OF THE WEEK
Could Wall Street’s Irrational Exuberance Underwrite America’s AI Future?
By: Alex TapscottManaging Director of the Ninepoint Digital Asset Group, a division of Ninepoint Partners, and Portfolio Manager of the  Ninepoint Crypto and AI Leaders ETF  at Ninepoint Partners

The United States is in the throes of an AI-driven industrial boom. While China builds through central planning and 5-year plans, America is now relying on the invisible hand of the market to transform its power grid and equip the country’s economy for the AI age.

This frenzy of investment is propelling tech stocks to record highs, while straining the grid, fueling community resistance, and raising an important, and perhaps, defining question -is this the dawn of a new industrial age, or a speculative bubble with a massive energy bill?

When Donald Trump recently praised China’s speed in building new infrastructure - “In China, they do it very quickly. They have one person that says, ‘Do it,’ and that's it,”- he was tapping into a growing anxiety that the U.S. may fall behind China. He quickly reassured attendees that now “we have one person that says, ‘Do it.’ And we've given that order,” meaning himself.

Of course, the U.S. economy doesn’t work by decree. But even without a strongman running the show, the U.S. is undergoing a profound transformation as Tech Giants and Wall Street investors underwrite a massive transformation to America’s energy grid, which has fueled a record stock market run and laid the groundwork for a new digital age.

A healthy dose of innovation, speculation and irrational exuberance – this is AI done the American Way.

The AI boom has already propelled the stock market to new highs, while concentrating the wealth in the hands of a few big companies. With a $4.3 trillion market cap, chipmaker NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, and bigger than all of Germany’s public companies combined.

Just how much are we investing in AI infrastructure? According to consultancy McKinsey, “By 2030, data centers are projected to require $6.7 trillion worldwide to keep pace with the demand for compute power.” This kind of spending is bound to impact and reshape the economy. According to the recent GDP figures, AI data center buildout contributed more to economic growth than all U.S. consumer spending.

Big Tech sees AI as its next profit engine. Now Wall Street wants in. After years of buying up vast housing tracts, office buildings, and public and private companies, private equity firms like Blackrock, KKR and Brookfield are concentrating their efforts on building up data center assets in communities across the country. And this is not just confined to America. Per Franzen, CEO of European private equity giant EQT said he expects data center investments and loans to be the biggest part of their business. Perhaps this flood of private capital will help Europe and the U.S. match China’s state-subsidized model.

The AI buildout is causing a reckoning in other areas too. The White House may call climate change a hoax, but the vast majority of Americans agree with the scientific consensus that it’s real, and support government efforts to reduce emissions. Will we abandon the fight against climate change, or will this new industrial revolution kick start a halcyon age of clean energy development that both meets AI’s power needs and propels us to a greener future? AI is catalyzing many green energy projects and kickstarting a nuclear renaissance, but coal fired power plants are ramping back up too.

And even if we take an all-of-the-above approach to energy, can we even build enough in time? In a June report, Deloitte said "The scale of AI data centers and their commensurate power needs are growing exponentially,” adding that by 2035, power demand from AI data centers in the United States could grow more than thirtyfold, reaching 123 gigawatts, up from 4 gigawatts in 2024." Power companies all cite grid stress as the leading challenge for data center infrastructure development.

A study from the International Energy Agency said that the world will add another Japan worth of energy usage from data centers alone by 2030, while in the U.S, data centers will account for half the growth in electricity demand this decade.

Power demand surged by 4.3% last year (more than double the annual average rate of the past decade) and power utilities are responding to demand. Dominion will spend $50 billion to expand Virginia’s grid. And American Electric Power is courting tech giants across Texas and Ohio. In Canada, Hydro One and Brookfield, one of the largest infrastructure investors in the world are trying to capture rising demand, with Brookfield already signing a 10.5 gigawatt renewable contract with Microsoft. Brookfield CEO Bruce Flatt said, “We believe AI infrastructure is one of the defining investment themes of the decade.”

To be sure, AI Datacenters can be a boon to local communities and a lifeline to a labour market that has seen an exodus of good blue-collar jobs. But not everyone is happy about them. “I planned on staying here until I died,” said 60 year old Richard Andre Newman of Fairfax County, Virginia in an interview with the Associated Press, “until this came up.” The “this” refers to Plaza 500, a colossal 466,000 square foot data centre a stone’s throw from a neighborhood in his community.

A recent Business Insider article proclaimed that data center projects are “pitting neighbour against neighbour” and encroaching on communities, saying, “a third of the operating data centers in the state are sited within 200 feet of residential areas." And according to a report from Data Center Watch cited in a recent Bloomberg article, “What was once quiet infrastructure is now a national flashpoint.” The group “found that $64 billion in data center projects were blocked or delayed in 24 states over the last two years due to local opposition."

With all these forces at play, Can the U.S. keep pace with China, its chief rival? China’s economic system has many flaws but one advantage of a command and control system is that infrastructure projects get built fast.

“Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI? My opinion is yes,” said OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, adding “Is AI the most important thing to happen in a very long time? My opinion is also yes.”

This duality captures our current moment. Despite AI’s immense potential, concerns about a bubble are growing. Already, just seven companies in the U.S. account for 1/3 of all private sector capital spending - and that’s almost entirely datacenters.

What happens when they turn off the spigot? Construction spending boosts GDP and adds jobs, but once operational, datacenters require relatively few staff. Last week’s job report (Sept 5 th) shows a weak labor market, despite the AI boom.

Then there is the risk to the stock market, where concentration is near a record high. Nvidia now represents 8% of the S&P500. Tech stocks, as of July,  accounted for 34 percent of the S&P 500 and valuations for some leaders are nearing dot-com levels. As Derek Thompson wrote recently, “in the last two years,  about 60 percent of the stock market’s growth has come from AI-related companies, such as Microsoft, Nvidia, and Meta. Without the AI boom, stock market returns would be putrid.”

What happens when the AI mania ends but the infrastructure remains? Many investors may lose out, but as a society and economy we may be better for it.

After all, not all bubbles are bad.

In the 19 th century, railroad speculation fueled a boom-and-bust cycle that helped connect a continent and underpin the age of American industrial ascendence. More than a century later, the Dot-Com mania fueled a multi-billion-dollar effort to lay high speed fiber-optic cable across oceans and continents. Neither would have been possible without a little irrational exuberance. As hedge fund billionaire Ray Dalio has said “there’s a major new technology that certainly will change the world and be successful,” but don’t confuse a successful technology with a successful investment.
THIS WEEK ON DEFI DECODED
Join Alex Tapscott and Andrew Young as they decode the world of crypto. Listen in as they discuss Google’s launch of its AI Agent Payments Protocol with stablecoin support, how AI agents could become the next interface for the Internet and even decentralize crypto governance, the soaring valuations of prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi and the forces behind them, Forward Industries’ $1.65 billion financing to establish the largest Solana DAT to date, the broader trajectory of DATs and whether the momentum is sustainable, how strong fundamentals are colliding with bearish sentiment to fuel what many are calling the most hated rally ever, and more.
WHAT'S NEW IN CRYPTO
By: Jake Moodie , Analyst, Digital Asset Group at Ninepoint Partners

BLACKROCK PLANS TO TOKENIZE REAL-WORLD ASSETS, LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE ROLLS OUT TOKENIZATION PLATFORM

Two weeks ago, we put out a Digital Asset Digest edition called Tokenization Tipping Point 2.0: The March of Real-World Assets Coming Onchain Accelerates,” highlighting a wave of company announcements encompassing initiatives to bring financial assets onchain. The following week, we covered two more big developments at the intersection of crypto and traditional markets: Nasdaq filing to allow tokenized stocks and ETFs on its platform and CBOE planning to launch perpetual futures for Bitcoin and Ethereum. If that wasn’t enough to show how quickly these worlds are converging, this week brought even more news. BlackRock is reportedly exploring tokenizing real-world assets (RWAs) like stocks and ETFs to make them more accessible by leveraging blockchain networks. This follows the huge success of their Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) and Ethereum ETF (ETHA), which have gathered $60 billion and $13 billion in net assets, respectively, since launching last year. To be sure, BlackRock already has one tokenized fund in the market: the BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL), a tokenized U.S. Treasury fund launched in March 2024 on Ethereum. BUIDL is the largest such fund today, with $2.2 billion in AUM across seven different networks. CEO Larry Fink has been one of tokenization’s biggest bulls, calling it “the next generation for markets” in 2023, echoing what Alex has been saying for years from his 2016 TEDx talk Blockchain is Eating Wall Street (that has over 1 million views across platforms) to his 2024 CoinDesk article Why Tokens Will Lead the Next Wave of Financial Innovation . Second, the London Stock Exchange launched a blockchain platform for tokenized private funds to help issuers create and manage tokenized assets within existing regulations, calling it the first step in a broader push that could extend to other asset classes. TL;DR: things are moving onchain, and fast.

PREDICTION MARKET EUPHORIA DRIVES MASSIVE VALUATION RERATE, POLYMARKET FROM $1B TO $10B AND KALSHI FROM $2B TO $5B IN LESS THAN THREE MONTHS

In June, Polymarket raised $200 million at a $1 billion valuation, while Kalshi raised $185 million at a $2 billion valuation. Now, just two and a half months later, both platforms are already back in the market for more capital. Polymarket is seeking a valuation of $9-10 billion (a 9-10x jump), while Kalshi is targeting $5 billion (a 2.5x increase). At a high level, this highlights just how much investor demand for prediction markets has taken off, especially after their breakout moment during the 2024 presidential election. Back then, Alex wrote a Fortune piece, Forget the pundits and polls—internet prediction markets anticipated Biden’s withdrawal weeks ago, that explains prediction markets well and their promise. Even though both Polymarket and Kalshi are prediction markets, they run on very different infrastructure. Polymarket is a peer-to-peer platform built on the Polygon blockchain and settled in Circle’s USDC stablecoin. Kalshi, by contrast, is a CFTC-regulated U.S. firm that requires dollar deposits and full KYC compliance. So why has Polymarket’s valuation run so far ahead of Kalshi’s? A few reasons. The CFTC recently gave Polymarket the green light to relaunch in the U.S., a huge win for the platform. On top of that, Donald Trump Jr.’s venture firm, 1789 Capital, invested tens of millions into the company, with Trump Jr. also joining as an advisor. This has definitely helped add some fuel to the fire. In our view, the most interesting, and least discussed, reason behind Polymarket’s massive re-rating is the increasingly supportive environment for a potential native token. As one of crypto’s most widely-used applications, with billions in monthly volume, the backdrop for a token launch has never been more favorable. One can only imagine the scale Polymarket could reach market-cap wise if it were to launch a token, given its existing user base and activity, especially relative to other projects. As evidence of this shifting environment, just look at Coinbase: after years of insisting Base would never have its own token, headlines this week revealed they’re exploring one. That kind of regulatory green light underscores just how much the landscape has shifted.
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
Chart 1:  TETHER ENTERS THE U.S. ARENA WITH NEW REGULATED STABLECOIN USAT
Last week, we shared a chart on the stablecoin landscape, spotlighting Circle’s USDC in light of the Hyperliquid USDH ticker auction. This week, the focus shifts to Tether. Why? Because last Friday, Tether unveiled USAT, a new U.S.-regulated stablecoin launching later this year that’s compliant with the GENIUS Act. Bo Hines, the former Head of the White House Crypto Council who helped push that law forward, will lead the initiative as head of Tether’s U.S. division. Anchorage Digital, a federally regulated crypto bank, will issue the token, while Cantor Fitzgerald will manage the reserves. Both Anchorage and Cantor will also take equity stakes in the new entity and share revenue from USAT’s reserves. So, what does this mean for Tether and the stablecoin market? Tether is already the largest stablecoin issuer in the world, with its flagship USDT making up about $170 billion in supply, or 61% of the market. Even though USDT supply has grown by $30 billion this year, its dominance has slipped from 68%. That tells us the overall pie is growing at a faster rate than USDT, with new entrants like Ethena’s USDe and Sky’s USDS gaining meaningful shares. USAT could drive a few things. First, it will likely grow the pie even further, helping activate more of crypto’s flywheels. Second, it may put some pressure on competitors like Circle’s USDC, but in the end that’s good for the market, competition fuels innovation and delivers better, more competitive options for users. Third, it helps Tether plant a stronger regulatory flag in the U.S., something it’s been lacking compared to others. Fourth, it diversifies revenue streams for Tether and brings in heavyweight partners like Anchorage and Cantor. Only time will tell how big this becomes, but it’s another sign of the rapidly accelerating competition in stablecoin land.
Chart 2:  ACCORDING TO “EXPERTS,” BITCOIN HAS DIED 440 TIMES SINCE ITS INCEPTION
They say humans have one life and cats have nine. But did you know Bitcoin has hundreds? Since its inception, Bitcoin has been declared dead 440 times by “expert” economists, market commentators, and traditional investors. In 2011, Forbes ran a piece titled So, That’s the End of Bitcoin Then after the price fell from $17 to under $1. In 2013, The New York Times published A Prediction: Bitcoin Is Doomed to Fail when Bitcoin was $1,000, arguing that “money not issued by governments is always doomed to failure.” In 2014, the Financial Times ran Cult Markets: When The Bubble Bursts,” declaring, “We’re going to stick our neck out at this stage and call this the end of Bitcoin.” In 2015, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said, Bitcoin will not survive, as there will be no currency that gets around government controls. You probably get the point. Every single one of these obituaries is plotted on the chart as a red dot against Bitcoin’s price. Ironically, the winning investment strategy would’ve been to fade every one of these “death calls.” If you had put $100 into Bitcoin each time, you’d have invested $44,000 in total. Today, that would be worth around $120 million. The takeaway from this chart: nobody really knows anything, and those obituaries were heavily concentrated in Bitcoin’s early years, while in more recent times, the red dots are few and far between.
COMMENTARY & INSIGHTS